Many networks
at once

Brain Neural Dynamics · Phase 1 · 2026

Reel 1 · Cold open

Brain Neural Dynamics

The brain does not
do one thing
at a time.

Thirty-two electrodes. Four hundred and ninety-six relationships between them. Every one of them changing by the millisecond.

The standing assumption

One winner.
Everything else
switched off.

Microstates, hidden Markov models, state-space clustering: at every instant the method picks one state and sets the rest to zero.

The field's dominant method, as reviewed in 2026

The crack in it

The field's own data
already says otherwise.

Measured geometrically, the timepoints assigned to one microstate sit roughly equally close to several. The distributions overlap. Hard labelling forces an ambiguous instant into a confident answer.

What BND does instead

Networks coexist.
Nothing competes.

Probabilities are never normalised across networks. Two networks can share Pz and both be fully on. There is no softmax, no partition, no winner.

And no fixed count: the number of networks emerges from the data

The second assumption we dropped

No sliding window.

Every method picks a window length. On a one-second epoch, a 250 ms window has already erased the dynamics you came for.

0.49–0.81
recovery, 60–500 ms windows
0.89
window-free

Tested against the alternative

On ground truth where
networks genuinely overlap.

BND, overlapping, 12 components0.852
Best exclusive-state model, any size to 240.656

Worst-recovered true network, Pearson r · the exclusive model used 2× to 16× the free parameters

And you can watch it happen

Four dimensions,
in the browser.

Every network keeps its colour and its identity across the whole epoch. Scrub the millisecond, isolate a network, watch two of them share an electrode.

Sensor space only. The head is scenery, not a claim about where anything is.

What it cannot do yet

It finds them.
It cannot yet count them.

The count rests on a threshold calibrated against noise, and that threshold moves. One dataset, four honest calibrations:

truth12 networks
reported, across four noise realisations14.3 – 17.5
sensitivity near the threshold83 networks per unit

test/cut.mjs · published, not buried. This is Phase 2's first job.

Brain Neural Dynamics

The model the microstate
critiques point at,
and nobody built.

Built
Window-free, count-free overlapping inference, with posteriors, and a 4D view that refuses to draw what it cannot support.
Next
Calibrate the count. Then real recordings, and the five-day learning design it was built for.
Needs
Recorded EEG, and a collaborator who wants the exclusivity assumption tested properly.

Every network here is a component recovered by a non-negative CP fit. Nothing on this stage was drawn by hand.

0:00 / 1:44

What is real here

Every number on screen comes from a test that can be re-run on demand, against a hidden ground truth. The recovery and benchmark results hold. The count does not, and the film says so.

What it is not

Not source localisation. Not a claim about where in the brain anything sits. BND infers relationships between scalp electrodes, resolved in time and frequency, and the anatomy on screen is reference only.

Phase 1 status

Three overlapping networks recovered at r = 0.995, 0.991 and 0.852, at the right sites and the right frequencies, with nothing found in matched noise. Counting is calibrated, not solved.